Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Monday, September 19, 2011

2012 Presidential Matchups - Obama 46%, Perry 39% - Rasmussen

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups

There are any number of opinion sources hyperventilating over this revelation this morning. It seems that the electorate is quickly catching on to Perry's lack of preparation for these debates and is colling to the idea of his presidency. As evidence, many cite that Rasmussen leans Republican and can often be depended upon to give revelations that support the GOP, so this must be accurate. Right?

Maybe. I don't give any more credence to this poll than I do the ones from Rasmussen in 2008 that showed Obama losing in 2008. They both serve what the Establishment GOP wants the storyline to be. In this case, this is part of the "kitchen sink" strategy now in force against anyone in Romney's way. The cynic class of the GOP, having spent last week casting doubt on Perry while holding Bachmann under water until her campaign was dead in the water, will tout this as evidence that Romney simply must be the nominee or Obama will repeat. While I admit that is indeed the case, this poll release is to bring the Tea-cons and the Birchers around to their way of thinking, as they could care less about electability.

Don't simply assume that because Rasmussen leans Republican that they were loathe to release this poll. I think it more likely that they were enlisted and are probably part of a 14-day plan to bring Perry down.

No comments:

Post a Comment