http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/162843-reid-breaks-with-obama-on-israeli-borders-condition-
I'm not of the philosophy that each party needs full partisan loyalty to each and every facet of their political universe. There should be some diversity within a party, there needs to be. What is really desperately needed though, is for Israel to take steps towards an agreement, whatever the preconditions.
There are some uncomfortable truths bubbling around this little snit:
1. The Arab Spring is not finished and in the end will move in unpredictable ways. Egypt, a country that was not quite an ally of Israel but predictably at peace, has been swept away and may return to the days when the border with Israel was "hot". Others may follow.
2. Hamas is legitimized and is forming a unity government with Fatah. Hamas is now an institution and not a militia, making it harder to stamp out or marginalize. Their views may moderate a bit, but as long as they are in power, Israel is not safe.
3. The US may not be able to sway events like it once did. A decade of attrition warfare and the financial tide going out have left the US with some difficult choices. In the coming decades, as Obama stated, we cannot predict where this will take us. Israel's dependency on the US will need to be reexamined by both parties.
4. Iran has seized the mantle of regional power. Apparently impervious to the Arab Spring for now, they will prop up a weakened Syria, exacting demands from them at the expense of Israel. With Egypt in turmoil, a moderating power is no longer there to counter-balance Iran, leaving them free to meddle where they please. One could argue that confrontation is a wise short-term strategy to hold off reform, to rally their population around them.
This is the point of many pundits in the past few days: Israel should not grovel before the United States, but as an ally upon whom their survival has been and continues to be dependent upon, is a little respect too much to ask?
Labels
2012
3D
abortion
afghanistan
africa
aging
agriculture
al qaeda
amazon
apple
architecture
art
asia
att
awesome
banks
barack obama
biology
birthers
bonds
books
britain
bruce bartlett
budget
business
cars
catholicism
charlie cook
china
chris christie
cisco
civil war
climate change
clive crook
conf'
conf'lict
conflict
conservatives
contactless payments
cooking
cuba
culture
david brooks
david frum
debt
deficit
democrats
design
disaster
disney
donald trump
drug policy
economics
education
egypt
employment
entertainment
entreprenuers
europe
extremism
facebook
family values
finance
firefox
food
fox news
france
games
gay rights
george w bush
george will
germany
gold
google
government
groupon
haley barbour
healthcare
herman cain
hispanics
history
housing
immigration
independents
india
innovation
insurance
internet
iphone
iran
iraq
ireland
islam
israel
ivory coast
japan
jim demint
jobs
joe klein
john huntsman
journalism
kentucky
korea
laptops
law
libertarianism
libya
literature
manufacturing
marriage equality
matt yglesias
media
medicaid
medicare
medicine
michelle bachmann
microsoft
middle east
mike huckabee
military
mitch daniels
mitt romney
mobile communications
movies
music
nate silver
national review
nature
nazis
netflix
nevada
new york times
news
newspapers
newt gingrich
nokia
north korea
obama
oil
pakistan
palin
paul krugman
paul ryan
pensions
pharmaceuticals
phones
photography
politics
politics2012the gop
politics2012the gop newt gingrich
polls
race
rand paul
red sox
reihan salam
religion
rick perry
rick santorum
ron paul
rush limbaugh
russia
samsung
sarah palin
saudi arabia
science
scott walker
seth godin
silicon valley
skype
social media
social security
socialism
sports
stocks
syria
tablets
taxes
tea party
technology
teenagers
terrorism
the constitution
the fed
the gop
the supreme court
the un
tim pawlenty
tom friedman
torture
trains
turkey
tv
unemployment
unions
us economy
verizon
wal mart
wall street
wall street journal
wikileaks
wisconsin
yemen
No comments:
Post a Comment