Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Friday, February 10, 2012

Do the Red Sox Really Need Roy Oswalt? - Derek Stykalo

http://bosoxinjection.com/2012/02/09/do-the-red-sox-really-need-roy-oswalt/

This begs the question.  Is Roy Oswalt the guy to come in and pitch in 180-200 innings?  Is he worth spending $8-10 million for one year to alleviate some of the work load from some other capable arms such as Silva, Cook or Padilla?  Even Aceves could be the fifth starter after Spring Training.
Simple answer is likely no, the Sox don’t need him.  But when you look at his past, that answer may change.  Last year Oswalt struggled to stay healthy for the course of the season, limiting him to just 139 innings.  But the previous seven seasons, he worked in over 200 innings in six of those years, and still threw in 180 innings in that one off year.  Sounds like he could be of some value to a Sox staff that needs a starter to gobble up some work.

No comments:

Post a Comment