Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Monday, February 20, 2012

Santorum challenges policy on prenatal testing - Tom Cohen

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/19/politics/santorum-prenatal-testing/


"One of the mandates is they require free prenatal testing in every insurance policy in America," Santorum, a conservative Roman Catholic, told a Christian Alliance luncheon in Columbus. "Why? Because it saves money in health care. Why? Because free prenatal testing ends up in more abortions and therefore less care that has to be done, because we cull the ranks of the disabled in our society."

The assumption that all prenatal testing is done to determine whether you want to abort the fetus or not is so misinformed and will alienate so many voters I wonder at this point if Santorum himself has decided that he would make a bad president and has decided to sabotage his own campaign. This statement, in one swoop, accuses all women who undergo prenatal testing, or want it to be free to expecting mothers, of being prospective aborters. While some portion of them may decide to abort the baby, I would wager that millions upon millions more just want to know and would also probably resent the accusation by Santorum.

What kind of dope speaks out against free prenatal testing? One that is beating Mitt Romney, of course.

No comments:

Post a Comment