http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/10/gaddafi-libya-nato
I'm becoming a bit anxious, as I'm sure a lot of people are. What now? Qadafi has shown that he is willing to use terrorism and whatever else he has at his disposal to do whatever it is he has set out to do. Exactly what that is has never been clear. Even if he defeats the opposition, what would be his plans at that point? How does he retain power in the face of oil embargoes and freezes on his own personal assets? He is more or less locked in geographically, so his options are even more limited than most of the other warlords we usually think about.
Lashing out at Italy? Terror for sale? The French and the British seem intent on landing a blow. The fact that they are publicly discussing it makes it seem somewhat inevitable. If not for Iraq, this would be a war the world could rally behind.
Labels
2012
3D
abortion
afghanistan
africa
aging
agriculture
al qaeda
amazon
apple
architecture
art
asia
att
awesome
banks
barack obama
biology
birthers
bonds
books
britain
bruce bartlett
budget
business
cars
catholicism
charlie cook
china
chris christie
cisco
civil war
climate change
clive crook
conf'
conf'lict
conflict
conservatives
contactless payments
cooking
cuba
culture
david brooks
david frum
debt
deficit
democrats
design
disaster
disney
donald trump
drug policy
economics
education
egypt
employment
entertainment
entreprenuers
europe
extremism
facebook
family values
finance
firefox
food
fox news
france
games
gay rights
george w bush
george will
germany
gold
google
government
groupon
haley barbour
healthcare
herman cain
hispanics
history
housing
immigration
independents
india
innovation
insurance
internet
iphone
iran
iraq
ireland
islam
israel
ivory coast
japan
jim demint
jobs
joe klein
john huntsman
journalism
kentucky
korea
laptops
law
libertarianism
libya
literature
manufacturing
marriage equality
matt yglesias
media
medicaid
medicare
medicine
michelle bachmann
microsoft
middle east
mike huckabee
military
mitch daniels
mitt romney
mobile communications
movies
music
nate silver
national review
nature
nazis
netflix
nevada
new york times
news
newspapers
newt gingrich
nokia
north korea
obama
oil
pakistan
palin
paul krugman
paul ryan
pensions
pharmaceuticals
phones
photography
politics
politics2012the gop
politics2012the gop newt gingrich
polls
race
rand paul
red sox
reihan salam
religion
rick perry
rick santorum
ron paul
rush limbaugh
russia
samsung
sarah palin
saudi arabia
science
scott walker
seth godin
silicon valley
skype
social media
social security
socialism
sports
stocks
syria
tablets
taxes
tea party
technology
teenagers
terrorism
the constitution
the fed
the gop
the supreme court
the un
tim pawlenty
tom friedman
torture
trains
turkey
tv
unemployment
unions
us economy
verizon
wal mart
wall street
wall street journal
wikileaks
wisconsin
yemen
Friday, March 11, 2011
Gaddafi takes key towns as Nato squabbles over Libya action - Peter Beaumont in Tripoli, Ian Traynor in Brussels and Nicholas Watt
Labels:
conflict,
libya,
middle east
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment