Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Thursday, March 17, 2011

House Ag Committee: Cut Food Stamps, not Farm Aid - Michael Crowley

http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2011/03/16/house-ag-committee-cut-food-stamps-not-farm-aid/

I've never known why ag producers, as opposed to farmers, are the beneficiaries of such largess. It agree with Crowley that this issue should be low hanging fruit for Republicans, as it benefits very few and perversely incents prices.

I suppose that farmers maintain an especially nostalgic part of our hearts, and politicians are pretty sure that they will be punished come election time for coming down on the wrong side of farmers, even though the vast majority of the subsidies go to corporate ag producers, not local farmers.

Then again I see the political calculus. Its just not an issue that anyone can win on. Campaign commercials would be overflowing with down home farmers appearing with your opponent and shaking their head at the mention of you. A farmer, mesh cap and overalls, shaking his head at the mention of you is not a winning image.

No comments:

Post a Comment