http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/27/magazine/mag-27lede-t.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
I personally don't think that newspapers or what is termed derisively "traditional media" is going to go extinct. The paradigm will change, the way we interact with our media will continue to evolve, but there is always going to be a demand for actual news, not just opinion. Much of the letdown with conservative media is that it is simply a passing of opinion on news reported by others. Fox news has made piles of millions based on this, as have their imitators. To further this, consumers have begun to view news as they do other products - they want the news, the reporting of actual events, to conform to what they "ordered". They don't want information that conflicts with their worldview, with their deeply held beliefs. They want it to confirm what they already believed.
This is what O'Keefe seeks to deliver: actual news in the form of what you already believed. The problem is that it is only useful in "cultural" narrative. What would O'Keefe do in Libya? How would his type of guerrilla reporting help you learn anything about Japan or how the earthquake victims are enduring? Julian Assange can belatedly distribute what officials thought, but only months later. This is where the traditional media will survive. Sure a blogger in Benghazi might be able to tell a story no reporter could get. A video posted from a cell phone can augment the story about the earthquake, but it can't tell us what we want or need to know.
The model we have right now is going to change, that is for sure. The Times and institutions like it had better change with the preferences of consumers if they want to survive, or at least attract consumers with superior product. I only hope, for all of our sakes, that the hunger for actual news, for the first hand description of world shaking events, never leaves us. Otherwise those that O'Keefe purports to despise and Assange fear will find it easier and easier to hide in plain sight.
Labels
2012
3D
abortion
afghanistan
africa
aging
agriculture
al qaeda
amazon
apple
architecture
art
asia
att
awesome
banks
barack obama
biology
birthers
bonds
books
britain
bruce bartlett
budget
business
cars
catholicism
charlie cook
china
chris christie
cisco
civil war
climate change
clive crook
conf'
conf'lict
conflict
conservatives
contactless payments
cooking
cuba
culture
david brooks
david frum
debt
deficit
democrats
design
disaster
disney
donald trump
drug policy
economics
education
egypt
employment
entertainment
entreprenuers
europe
extremism
facebook
family values
finance
firefox
food
fox news
france
games
gay rights
george w bush
george will
germany
gold
google
government
groupon
haley barbour
healthcare
herman cain
hispanics
history
housing
immigration
independents
india
innovation
insurance
internet
iphone
iran
iraq
ireland
islam
israel
ivory coast
japan
jim demint
jobs
joe klein
john huntsman
journalism
kentucky
korea
laptops
law
libertarianism
libya
literature
manufacturing
marriage equality
matt yglesias
media
medicaid
medicare
medicine
michelle bachmann
microsoft
middle east
mike huckabee
military
mitch daniels
mitt romney
mobile communications
movies
music
nate silver
national review
nature
nazis
netflix
nevada
new york times
news
newspapers
newt gingrich
nokia
north korea
obama
oil
pakistan
palin
paul krugman
paul ryan
pensions
pharmaceuticals
phones
photography
politics
politics2012the gop
politics2012the gop newt gingrich
polls
race
rand paul
red sox
reihan salam
religion
rick perry
rick santorum
ron paul
rush limbaugh
russia
samsung
sarah palin
saudi arabia
science
scott walker
seth godin
silicon valley
skype
social media
social security
socialism
sports
stocks
syria
tablets
taxes
tea party
technology
teenagers
terrorism
the constitution
the fed
the gop
the supreme court
the un
tim pawlenty
tom friedman
torture
trains
turkey
tv
unemployment
unions
us economy
verizon
wal mart
wall street
wall street journal
wikileaks
wisconsin
yemen
No comments:
Post a Comment