Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Monday, March 7, 2011

Is America moving to arm the Libyan opposition?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/americas-secret-plan-to-arm-libyas-rebels-2234227.html

According to this story, not quite. Asking the Saudis is they can spare some weapons to funnel to the Libyans, in the midst of the Saudis own troubles, is not exactly a sweeping gesture. The opposition presents a complex problem: while Qadafi is quite mad and unpopular, he has also lasted four decades. Throwing our lot in with an unorganized resistance is risky and may not be what they need, especially if by choosing one faction we fracture the fragile balance of power that opposes Qadafi right now.

At this point there are probably several power centers swirling around in the resistance. Picking one for the sake of expediency could lend it gravity and credibility, which could turn out great or it could turn out in disaster. Perhaps the Saudis, who have learned a thing or two about lasting themselves, could divine which group or individual is best suited to deliver the future in Libya. Probably not, but this underlines the American quandary: how to take advantage of an opportunity we have been waiting for for four decades without becoming enmeshed in yet another war in the Middle East.

No comments:

Post a Comment