http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/view-new-hampshire_616000.html?google_editors_picks=true
Romney's tie with Santorum in Iowa looks more like a victory for Santorum than it does a positive for Romney. While Romney scored big with those that consider defeating Obama their top priority, Santorum was buoyed by his perceived hard edge social conservatism, the scant airing of his controversial views, and his ability to not be Mitt Romney when it counted. Santorum would be better served to skip Hew Hampshire and concentrate on South Carolina, where his loony views and nonsensical positions will be given more consideration. Add to that the fact that Perry and possibly Bachmann will no longer be in the race at that point and their voters are more inclined to Santorum than Romney. That could be a huge factor if Gingrich plays his role in the next week and simply stabs at Romney over and over while ignoring Santorum.
Mitt should roll in New Hampshire, as he was on TV there for years as the governor of a nearby state and his moderate ways pay off better in old New England. The danger is if he doesn't dominate. Leaving nothing to chance, he's focused on New Hampshire for years and only gave Iowa consideration late in the game, when it appeared that he might be able to actually win it.
New Hampshire is important, but we expect Romney to score a resounding victory there. The true indicator of the race will be whether or not Santorum can continue to evade his record and be an abstract alternative to Romney for the next ten or so days. Santorum cannot win the nomination, but he can wound Romney to the point where he cannot win the election.
Labels
2012
3D
abortion
afghanistan
africa
aging
agriculture
al qaeda
amazon
apple
architecture
art
asia
att
awesome
banks
barack obama
biology
birthers
bonds
books
britain
bruce bartlett
budget
business
cars
catholicism
charlie cook
china
chris christie
cisco
civil war
climate change
clive crook
conf'
conf'lict
conflict
conservatives
contactless payments
cooking
cuba
culture
david brooks
david frum
debt
deficit
democrats
design
disaster
disney
donald trump
drug policy
economics
education
egypt
employment
entertainment
entreprenuers
europe
extremism
facebook
family values
finance
firefox
food
fox news
france
games
gay rights
george w bush
george will
germany
gold
google
government
groupon
haley barbour
healthcare
herman cain
hispanics
history
housing
immigration
independents
india
innovation
insurance
internet
iphone
iran
iraq
ireland
islam
israel
ivory coast
japan
jim demint
jobs
joe klein
john huntsman
journalism
kentucky
korea
laptops
law
libertarianism
libya
literature
manufacturing
marriage equality
matt yglesias
media
medicaid
medicare
medicine
michelle bachmann
microsoft
middle east
mike huckabee
military
mitch daniels
mitt romney
mobile communications
movies
music
nate silver
national review
nature
nazis
netflix
nevada
new york times
news
newspapers
newt gingrich
nokia
north korea
obama
oil
pakistan
palin
paul krugman
paul ryan
pensions
pharmaceuticals
phones
photography
politics
politics2012the gop
politics2012the gop newt gingrich
polls
race
rand paul
red sox
reihan salam
religion
rick perry
rick santorum
ron paul
rush limbaugh
russia
samsung
sarah palin
saudi arabia
science
scott walker
seth godin
silicon valley
skype
social media
social security
socialism
sports
stocks
syria
tablets
taxes
tea party
technology
teenagers
terrorism
the constitution
the fed
the gop
the supreme court
the un
tim pawlenty
tom friedman
torture
trains
turkey
tv
unemployment
unions
us economy
verizon
wal mart
wall street
wall street journal
wikileaks
wisconsin
yemen
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment