Labels

2012 3D abortion afghanistan africa aging agriculture al qaeda amazon apple architecture art asia att awesome banks barack obama biology birthers bonds books britain bruce bartlett budget business cars catholicism charlie cook china chris christie cisco civil war climate change clive crook conf' conf'lict conflict conservatives contactless payments cooking cuba culture david brooks david frum debt deficit democrats design disaster disney donald trump drug policy economics education egypt employment entertainment entreprenuers europe extremism facebook family values finance firefox food fox news france games gay rights george w bush george will germany gold google government groupon haley barbour healthcare herman cain hispanics history housing immigration independents india innovation insurance internet iphone iran iraq ireland islam israel ivory coast japan jim demint jobs joe klein john huntsman journalism kentucky korea laptops law libertarianism libya literature manufacturing marriage equality matt yglesias media medicaid medicare medicine michelle bachmann microsoft middle east mike huckabee military mitch daniels mitt romney mobile communications movies music nate silver national review nature nazis netflix nevada new york times news newspapers newt gingrich nokia north korea obama oil pakistan palin paul krugman paul ryan pensions pharmaceuticals phones photography politics politics 2012 the gop politics 2012 the gop  newt gingrich polls race rand paul red sox reihan salam religion rick perry rick santorum ron paul rush limbaugh russia samsung sarah palin saudi arabia science scott walker seth godin silicon valley skype social media social security socialism sports stocks syria tablets taxes tea party technology teenagers terrorism the constitution the fed the gop the supreme court the un tim pawlenty tom friedman torture trains turkey tv unemployment unions us economy verizon wal mart wall street wall street journal wikileaks wisconsin yemen

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

The View from New Hampshire - Jonathan V. Last

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/view-new-hampshire_616000.html?google_editors_picks=true

Romney's tie with Santorum in Iowa looks more like a victory for Santorum than it does a positive for Romney. While Romney scored big with those that consider defeating Obama their top priority, Santorum was buoyed by his perceived hard edge social conservatism, the scant airing of his controversial views, and his ability to not be Mitt Romney when it counted. Santorum would be better served to skip Hew Hampshire and concentrate on South Carolina, where his loony views and nonsensical positions will be given more consideration. Add to that the fact that Perry and possibly Bachmann will no longer be in the race at that point and their voters are more inclined to Santorum than Romney. That could be a huge factor if Gingrich plays his role in the next week and simply stabs at Romney over and over while ignoring Santorum.

Mitt should roll in New Hampshire, as he was on TV there for years as the governor of a nearby state and his moderate ways pay off better in old New England. The danger is if he doesn't dominate. Leaving nothing to chance, he's focused on New Hampshire for years and only gave Iowa consideration late in the game, when it appeared that he might be able to actually win it.

New Hampshire is important, but we expect Romney to score a resounding victory there. The true indicator of the race will be whether or not Santorum can continue to evade his record and be an abstract alternative to Romney for the next ten or so days. Santorum cannot win the nomination, but he can wound Romney to the point where he cannot win the election.

No comments:

Post a Comment